2007 (9) TMI 525

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)]. - This is Department's appeal against the order of the Commissioner No. 36/DEM/2002 dt. 24-9-2002. 2. None appears for the respondent. Heard ld. SDR. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are as follows :- (a)     The respondent, an independent processor of textile fabrics, were....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gainst the dropping of the demand for the months of June and July, 2000. 4. Ld. SDR submits that the stenters were not got sealed in the manner prescribed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, but only sealed by the Financial Corporation viz. M/s. Gujarat State Financial Corporation. The dropping of demands is not in order. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions and the g....