2007 (2) TMI 574
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., for the Appellant. Shri Samir Chitkara, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - Vide impugned order benefit of notification No. 108/95-C.E. dated 28-8-95 has been denied to the appellants on the ground that the certificate of proper authority produced on record as a condition of the notification is to the effect that the project was being financed by Japan Ba....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... such type of certificates were being issued by the proper officers in most of the cases where the projects were being financed by the said bank, under a bona fide belief that the said bank is a notified international organization. The dispute in other identical matters travelled up to the Tribunal and in their judgment in the case of Danke Electricals Ltd. v. CCE, Vadodara - 2003 (160) E.L.....
TaxTMI