2008 (3) TMI 604

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....4/- Rs. 6 lakh Rs. 5 lakh 2. -do- C/674/2007 OIO No. 23/2007 dated 30-7-2007 Rs. 35,14,192/- Rs. 9 lakh Rs. 5.75 lakh 3. Riddhi Siddhi Enterprise C/675/2007 OIO No. 24/2007 dated 30-7-2007 Rs. 25,73,868/- Rs. 6.50 lakh Rs. 4 lakh 4. M/s. Office Devices C/676/2007 OIO No. 26/2007 dated 30-8-2007 Rs. 38,19,100/- Rs. 10 lakh Rs. 5 lakh In all these appeals the issue involved is one and the same, therefore, we are taking up all the four appeals for issuing a common order. 2. Shri N. Anand, Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellant and Shri K. Sambi Reddi, Authorised Representative (JDR) for the Revenue. 3. We heard both sides. In all these cases, the appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....By Final Order 1231 - 1233/2007 dated 31-10-2007 & also by Final Order No. 26 & 27/2006 dated 28-12-2006 (iii)   Atul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. v. CC, Cochin - 2006 (205) E.L.T. 950 (Tri.- Bang.) (iv)   Rajeswari Graphics v. CC - 2007 (212) E.L.T. 117 (Tri.-Bang.) (v)     Rex Printing Press v. CC - 2005 (184) E.L.T. 73 (Tri.-Bang.) 4. The learned advocate raised several grounds while appealing against the imposition of harsh fine and penalty. The learned advocate did not challenge the confiscation of the impugned goods but they challenged only the quantum of imposition of redemption fine and penalty. It was urged that the redemption fine and penalty imposed are exorbitant. The actual pric....