2008 (10) TMI 408

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri J. Ashty David, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. -  This appeal of the Revenue is against concurrent findings of the original authority and the first appellate authority. Both the authorities held that the goods cleared by the respondents from time to time against a single purchase order constituted paper making machine classifiable under SH 8439.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appeal reads thus : "In view of the above, the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) deserves to be set aside by restoring the above Order-in-Original..." It is pointed out that the Order-in-Original was also against the Revenue and that this appeal is against both the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal. We have also heard the counsel for the respondent. 2. After cons....