2008 (9) TMI 651

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appellant. Shri V.P.C. Rao, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - This misc. application for ROM has been filed in respect of the Final Order Nos. 714 to 719/2007 dated 28-6-2007 passed by this Bench. 2. Shri Laxminarayan Goyal, the learned Consultant, appeared on behalf of the applicants and Shri V.P.C. Rao, the learned SDR, for the Revenue. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....have been typed as 15-6-1999 in the Final Order in para 11(iii) page 24 and also in page 26 (lines 8 and 9) of the order. This is only a typographical error. The same can be corrected. Hence, instead of 15-6-1999, it should be read as 15-9-1999. 5.1 The second mistake, which has been pointed out is as follows:-In the Final Order in para 12(v), at the end, it has been stated that "Interest ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rse of arguments on interest, the counsel canvassed that the entire duty demand relates to earlier period prior to introduction of proviso to sec. 11AB and SCN was issued on 8-10-2001 i.e. after introduction of Proviso to Sec. 11AB. Applicants are not liable for any payment of interest for the earlier period prior to 11-5-2001 as SCN is issued on 8-10-2001 raising the duty demand. 5. Howev....