2008 (7) TMI 735

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Prem Kumar Rajan, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : Rakesh Kumar, Member (T)]. -  This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against order-in-appeal dt. 16-2-05 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi by which he set aside the loading of the assessable value of certain goods imported by the Respondents. The Respondent had imported a consignment of camera and fil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llenged this order before the Commissioner (Appeals)'s pleading that the loading is without any justification and that in view of Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in the case of Dunlop India Ltd. v. UOI reported in 1983 (13) E.L.T. 1566 (S.C.), the acceptance of enhanced value proposed by the department does not preclude them from challenging the enhancement by filing the appeal. The Commissioner (A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s order in the case of Polyglass Acrylic Manufacture Co. (P) Ltd. [2005 (184) E.L.T. 310 (Tri.-Del.)]. He also pleaded that in all the cases, the value has been enhanced as the contemporaneous imports of identical or similar goods at the loaded value had been noticed. 2.2 Shri V.K. Agarwal, Advocate, ld. Counsel on behalf of the Respondent, pleaded that no evidence had been produced by the....