2008 (7) TMI 733

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. -  This appeal of the Revenue is against dropping of demand of duty of Rs. 4,99,347/- by the lower appellate authority in favour of the respondents for the period 1994-95 and 1995-96 in respect of re-rolled products of iron and steel. The original authority had demanded the above amount of duty from the respondents for the abo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ne manufacture of re-rolled products by the respondents. It is submitted that such corroborative evidence was ignored by the Commissioner (Appeals). A list of documents relied on in the show-cause notice has been furnished by the appellant under ground No. 2. It is submitted that these documents were "corroborative to each other". Much reliance has been placed on the statement dt. 26-11-96 of Sri ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the evidentiary value of their statements should not discounted. The ld. SDR has reiterated these ground of the appeal. 3. There is no representation for the respondents despite notice, nor any request of theirs for adjournment. 4. We have examined the records in general and the grounds of this appeal in particular. It is significant to note that certain crucial findings recorded ....