2008 (6) TMI 484
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....thapathy, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - This appeal of the Revenue is for recovery of an amount of Rs. 24,717/- being 8% of the sale price (excluding tax) of the respondents' final products cleared, without payment of duty, to M/s. SHARE Centre (SC) and M/s. Bhaba Atomic Research Centre (BARC) during October to December'97. In the impugned order, the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cross-objections filed by the party. 2. After considering the submissions, we have found valid reason to sustain the impugned order. Though, in their cross-objections, the party has pleaded that none of the inputs specified in the SCN and the Order-in-Original can be considered to be a common input for purposes of Rule 57CC, we think, it is not necessary to address this question inasmuch a....
TaxTMI