Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (6) TMI 447

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mar, the learned Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellants and Smt. Sudha Koka, the learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue. 3. We heard both sides. 4. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Plastic Storage Tanks, which are excisable. After scrutiny of the balance sheets, Revenue issued Show Cause Notices for the period from 1999 to 2003 on the ground that the appellants had not reversed the Cenvat Credit attributable to work in progress shown in the balance sheets while opting for SSI Exemption. For the period 2004-2005 also a similar Show Cause Notice was issued. The Original Authority confirmed the demand proposed in the Show Cause Notices. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the orders of the Origi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dha Castings (P) Ltd. - 2005 (122) ECR 443 (T) 8. Further, it was submitted that in the appellant's own case, it was held that credit automatically lapses and demand cannot be sustained- 2007 (209) E.L.T. 229 (T). 9. The learned Departmental Representative stated that when the appellant opted for SSI Exemption in the beginning of the year, a declaration to the department was submitted to the effect that the work in progress is nil. However, the balance sheet which is also a statutory document indicated the work in progress. Thus, the appellant mis-declared the fact to the department. Hence, there is an offence and the consequences of the same should be borne by the appellant. She requested the Bench to uphold the impugned or....