2008 (4) TMI 607

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....krant Kackria, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the Respondents are engaged in the manufacture of sugar and molasses classifiable under Headings 1701 and 1703 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On scrutiny of the Balance Sheet and General Ledger by the Audit Party, it was noticed that the Respondent purchased D.G....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 along with interest. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the Adjudication order on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation. 2. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the records, I find that the Respondent deposited the duty voluntarily upon detection by the Audit party without any protest. The Respondent had not filed any refund cl....