Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 514

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)]. - This is Department's appeal against the order of the Commissioner No. 26/MP/2002 dt. 13-9-2002. 2. Heard the ld. JDR for the Department. None appeared for the respondent. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are as follows :- (a) The respondent, a 100% EOU, imported duty free raw materials and also procured duty free....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red above confirmed excise duty of Rs. 19,39,591/- on "the finished products" and imposed a penalty of Rs. 19,39,600/-. He, however, held that demand of duty on raw materials used in the manufacture of the goods which were treated as waste/rejects over and above, duty demanded on the final products was not sustainable as it was not a case of removal of duty free inputs as such. (e) The Dep....