2008 (4) TMI 588

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eet Singh with V. Swamynathan, Advocates, for the Appellant. S/Shri A.N. Sharma, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. -  Heard both sides. Common issue is involved in these orders, therefore, they are being taken up together. The applicant filed these applications for waiver of pre-deposit of duties and penalties. The appeals filed by the applicants were....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... hearing should have granted to the applicants. 3. The contention of the Revenue is that the Commissioner (Appeals) after going through the evidence on record, asked the applicant to deposit very nominal amount compared to the demand confirmed by the adjudicating authority and the applicant failed to comply with the condition of the stay orders, therefore, the appeals are rightly dismissed....