Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (11) TMI 513

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order]. - Although several opportunities were given to the Appellant as early as 24-7-2006 for making deposit of 50% of the penalty demanded, the Appellant failed to comply with the Stay Order passed on 9-6-2006. As a measure of following of natural justice, on 8-12-2006 again the Appellant was given another chance to comply with the Stay Order passed by 22-12-2006. Thereafter, the matter wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....proper evidence. When the Department could detect breach of law in respect of the above import, both the CHA and the importer tried to plead their ignorance but without clean hands and evidence led. The ld. Commissioner by a speaking and reasoned order, found that Shri Mustafa Seikh an employee of the CHA Appellant by his statement dated 19-8-2003 categorically stated that on the telephone message....