2007 (11) TMI 513
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... [Order]. - Although several opportunities were given to the Appellant as early as 24-7-2006 for making deposit of 50% of the penalty demanded, the Appellant failed to comply with the Stay Order passed on 9-6-2006. As a measure of following of natural justice, on 8-12-2006 again the Appellant was given another chance to comply with the Stay Order passed by 22-12-2006. Thereafter, the matter wa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....proper evidence. When the Department could detect breach of law in respect of the above import, both the CHA and the importer tried to plead their ignorance but without clean hands and evidence led. The ld. Commissioner by a speaking and reasoned order, found that Shri Mustafa Seikh an employee of the CHA Appellant by his statement dated 19-8-2003 categorically stated that on the telephone message....
TaxTMI