Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (8) TMI 598

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Shri M.M. Mathkar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The issue involved in the present appeal is the correct classification of Aluminium foil covered on, the both sides by polyester film. The appellant has claimed the classification under Chapter 39, whereas the Revenue's contention is that the same would fall under Chapter 76. 2. Ld. Advocate....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... issued in 2003 that the product is classifiable under Chapter 75, the benefit of the same should be extended to them. 3. Countering the above arguments, ld. JDR Shri M.M. Mathkar submits that as the issues stands decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the appeal is required to be dismissed. 4. We are not in agreement with the submissions made by Shri S.R. Dixit, ld. Advocate. He ad....