2008 (2) TMI 721

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....B.S. Suhag, DR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. The appellant filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby refund filed by the appellant was rejected. 3. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of sugar. The appellant applied for permission to store the sugar outside the factory premises without payment of duty. The permission was granted on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rules. The appellant relied upon various circulars issued by the Revenue to submit that manufacturer has not to pay any supervision charges. The contention is also that the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order agreed that refund is not time-barred, therefore, the impugned order is beyond the scope of show-cause notice. 7. The contention of the Revenue is that the appellant asked f....