2008 (2) TMI 721

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....[Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. The appellant filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby refund filed by the appellant was rejected. 3. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of sugar. The appellant applied for permission to store the sugar outside the factory premises without payment of duty. The permission was granted on the condition that appellants are liable to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s issued by the Revenue to submit that manufacturer has not to pay any supervision charges. The contention is also that the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order agreed that refund is not time-barred, therefore, the impugned order is beyond the scope of show-cause notice. 7. The contention of the Revenue is that the appellant asked for concession to store the sugar outside the factory....