2008 (2) TMI 682
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri Ravi Raghavan, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President (for the Bench)]. - Heard both sides. Revenue filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby the refund of pre-deposit was allowed. 2. The only issue raised by the Revenue is regarding the calculation of the interest. In this case, the pre-deposit was made on 2-5-91 and the Tribun....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....for the following period :- 1. 21-4-1994 (three months after the final order of CEGAT dated 21-1-1994) to 3-10-2000 (date of CEGAT's Stay order) 2. 14-3-2001 (three months after the final order of CEGAT dated 14-12-2000) to 31-7-2002 (date of stay order of CEGAT) 3. 4-3-2004 (three months after the f....
TaxTMI