2007 (10) TMI 485
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppellant. Shri D.P. Mukhopadhyay, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This appeal is directed against order-in-appeal No. 470/2006/MCH/DC/Gr.III/06, dt. 5-10-06. 2. The issue pertains to collection of Anti-dumping duty on vitrified/porcelain tiles during the period 2-11-2002 to 30-4-2003. Provisional of Anti-dumping duty was levied on vitrif....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... by the judgment and order of the Co-ordinate Bench in appeal No. C/2/07 vide order Nos. A/412-419/WZB/2007/CSTB/C-I, dt. 1-8-2007 [2007 (217) E.L.T. 528 (Tribunal)]. He submits that the Division Bench of the Tribunal had gone into in detail of the levy of Anti-dumping duty and held that provisional assessment for imposition of Anti-dumping duty cannot be borrowed and imposed. It is his submission....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... by the Three Member Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Nitco Tiles Ltd. v. Designated Authority and held that during the interregnum period the Anti-dumping duty is liable to be paid by the importers. It is seen from the order of the Division Bench in the case of Harsh International & Ors. vide order Nos. A/412-419/WZB/2007, dt. 1-8-2007, 2007 (217) E.L.T. 528 (Tribunal), the Hon'ble Bench has ....
TaxTMI