Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 478

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ms. Nazia Afroz, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri K.K. Sharan, Inspector of C. Ex., for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Clothed in the robes of authenticity, this impugned order, exemplifies, typical bureaucratic bellicosity towards the tax payer. The tragic flaw scripted into this otherwise innocuous order is the claim of the Adjudicator that he granted four Personal Hearings on 12-12....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted that as per the procedure adopted by the Central Excise Department all the notices of the Personal Hearing fixing a date are to be issued under registered cover to the assessee. In the instant case fixing of dates of hearing on consecutive dates on 12-12-12006, 13-12-2006, 14-12-2006 and 15-12-2006 goes to show that Central Excise Department was neither concerned with proper service of notice ....