Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (8) TMI 574

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The appellants are cement manufacturers. They had taken Modvat credit on various items including (a) Truck loading machine with control panel, belt-conveyors and bag divertors; (b) H.B. Chart, and (c) Calibrator during the period March to August, 1994. The lower authorities disallowed the credit taken on the above three items and ordered recovery of Rs. 6,25....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ridges used in the factory of the manufacturer." 3. The first item viz. 'Truck loading machine with belt-conveyers and bag divertors' was used for diverting, conveying and loading fully packed product [cement in bags] on to trucks. This position is evident from the MATERIAL FLOW CHART produced by learned Counsel as also from the write-up produced by him. The write-up, however, says that, w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....chine and the wagon loading machine function identically. The appellants have not claimed capital goods credit on the wagon loading machine, nor is there any material, on record to indicate that such credit was allowed to them by the department. If that be so, the appellant cannot claim similar benefit on the truck loading machine and accessories thereof. Both these machines have post-manufactural....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....decision of this Bench in Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd. v. CCE, Tiruchirapalli - 2001 (130) E.L.T. 397 (Tri. Chennai) cited by learned SDR supports this view. In that case, capital goods credit was held to be inadmissible to bag stacker which was a shelf arrangement in which bags filled with sugar duly stitched and labelled are stacked before removal from the factory. Bag stacking was found to be a po....