2007 (8) TMI 526
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri N.J. Kumaresh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - After examining the records and hearing both sides, we note that the appellant has been asked to pay differential duty of Rs. 8,28,753/- and an equal amount of penalty on washing machines for the period 12-5-2000 to 13-5-2003. Washing machines are covered by the MRP regime for the purpose of payment ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....has to be shown that there was alteration of declared retail price on the label of the goods. Learned counsel has referred to the Tribunal's decision in Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad - 2006 (199) E.L.T. 718 (Tri.- Del.), wherein the scheme of MRP based valuation of goods was examined and it was held that 'actual' retail sale price had no place....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI