Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (6) TMI 443

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L. Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. -  The lower Authorities have denied SSI exemption under Notfn. No. 1/93-C.E., dated 28-2-1993 (as amended) to the assessee and accordingly demanded duty of Rs. 4,09,168/- from them. They have also imposed equal amount of penalty on them. The demand is in respect of goods, which were allegedly cleared under the br....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on merits on the strength of another judgment of the Apex Court in the case of CCE v. Bhalla Enterprises [2004 (173) E.L.T. 225 (S.C.)]. The ld. SDR reiterates the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. After considering the submissions made by both sides, we are of the view that the appellants have made out prima facie case on the ground of limitation inasmuch as the only reason state....