2007 (7) TMI 452
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Ms. H. Aparna, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. AT/641/Bel/2005, dated 30-11-2005. 2. When the matter was called out, the Advocate appearing for the respondent raised preliminary objection against the appeal filed by the revenue. It is her submission that the authorization directing the officer to file an appeal has....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....issioner was holding additional charges of Commissioner, Belapur. Hence, the authorization given by the ld. Commissioner in the capacity of Commissioner Belapur as well as the Commissioner, Central Excise, Raigad is conect. He relies upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Raigad v. Remi Fans Pvt. Ltd., as reported in 2007-TIOL-573-CESTAT-Mum. 4. Considered the submissions ma....
TaxTMI