Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (6) TMI 338

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....None, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Heard ld. DR. The respondent is called absent. The department is in appeal against the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik who has dismissed their review appeal on the ground of Doctrine of Merger. In the present appeal the department challenged that the aforesaid doctrine do not come into play at all in view of the f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p;Now the point for determination is that whether the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) by applying the principle of Doctrine of Merger is proper, legal and correct one. 3. First of all it is to be observed that the department has limitation of about one year time for filing review appeal against the order-in-original. As the process took some time in preparing the appeal....