2007 (4) TMI 487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....M. Matkar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This appeal is against order of Commissioner (Appeals) No. 541/2005(541-A-III)CE/DK/Comr(A), dated 13-7-05, upholding the order of the original authority No. 41/JC/2004, dated 28-7-04. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are as follows : (i)      The appellant was availing the benefit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts attributable to finished goods lying in the factory, which was yet to be cleared, and took credit amounting to Rs. 6,99,050/-. The department took a view that the inputs have been received during the period prior to 1-3-03 and credit should not be taken and this view has been confirmed by original authority and upheld by Commissioner (Appeals). 4. The learned Advocate for the appellant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld have been made in pursuance to notification No. 10/2002-CE, and the condition of non-availment of Cenvat credit stands fully imposed. If the appellant received raw material from 1-3-03 and start manufacturing, they are eligible to avail concessional rate and simultaneously enjoy the benefit of Cenvat credit. It is to be noted that if the rate of duty had gone up from 1-3-03, the appellant would....