2007 (2) TMI 450

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....one, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  The Revenue is aggrieved with the Order-in-Original No. 11/2002 BNG-II, dated 16-4-2002 dropping a portion of demand raised by the Department on the matter being remanded for de novo consideration. The Commissioner has confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 60,773/- only. The Department's objection is that the order passed by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uld make efforts for publication of the notice in the News Papers. However, we find that there is no provision in Central Excise Act for Publication of notice in the News Papers. The Apex Court in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. Electrolytic Foils Ltd. [1997 (91) E.L.T. 543 (S.C.)] it has been held that when the Revenue has failed to serve notice on the Respondents, then the ....