2007 (1) TMI 408

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Godbole, Sr. Manager, for the Appellant. Shri R.B. Pardeshi, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both the side, we find that investigations were initiated against the appellant as regards payment of duty on Aluminum Dross/Ash and Residues. During the course of investigation appellant deposited an amount of around Rs. 42 lakhs. Subsequently, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ch have to be considered as deposits. The part of the amount so deposited has not been found by the Commissioner to be payable. As such, the appellants are entitled to the excess amount deposits by them. The law on the point that such deposits are not hit by the barred by limitation stands decided by a number of precedent decisions of the Tribunal. Reference in this regard may be made to Tribunal'....