2007 (2) TMI 403
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....i M.K. Guha Neogi, Consultant, for the Appellant. Shri Anil Kumar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - Both the stay applications pertain to the same party. Hence they are taken up together for hearing. E/St/775/06 in E/1103/06 2. The appellant is required to pre-deposit Rs 4,12,480/-. They had cleared the goods in the domestic market on payment of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e to deposit will entail dismissal of the appeal. Call on to report compliance on 16-5-07. E/St/776/06 in E/1104/06 5. The appellant is required to pre-deposit Rs. 12,236 in stay application No. 776/06 arising from Appeal No. 1104/06. The appellants have been denied the benefit of Notification No. 126/94 in respect of iron safe. The appellants contend that iron safe is needed for safe k....
TaxTMI