2006 (12) TMI 386

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Reddi, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 134/2006 dated 19-5-2006 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the Customs House Agent's (CHA) appeal and confirmed the Order-in-Original No. 86/2005 dated 13-9-2005 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Customs imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on him for the charge ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the appellant. Therefore there is no corroborative evidence on record and hence the penalty cannot be imposed on him. 2. The learned JDR submits that the duty of CHA is to supervise the work of his employees and he is responsible for their action and penalty is imposable. 3. The learned Counsel relied on the Tribunal judgment rendered in the case of High Court of Madras rendere....