2006 (12) TMI 374

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellant. Shri L.P. Dhir, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.K. Abichandani, President]. - In this stay application, the Revenue prays for the stay of the order in appeal dated 31st July 2006 made by the Commissioner (Appeals) in which the Commissioner has held that the appeal was not maintainable since the order of the Assistant Commissioner was made in compliance of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ceeded in the Hon'ble the Supreme Court, it shall be entitled to re-quantify the amount payable to the petitioner and recover the excess amount, if any. Thereafter, pursuant to the order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, it appears that the Assistant Commissioner made an order on 15-10-2004 sanctioning an amount of Rs. 39,37,301/- as interest payable to the respondent out of which, since Rs. 11,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve to be re-quantified in accordance with the said decision of the Apex court. 3. It is clear from the adjudication order that, the order itself contemplated re-quantification of the amount payable to the present respondent and recovery of excess amount, if any, was to be done, if that was so warranted by the decision of the Apex Court. Therefore, if the process of re-quantification is war....