Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (2) TMI 391

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s, for the Appellant. Shri Deepak Garg, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T) (for the Bench)]. -  Heard both sides and perused the record. 2. The appellant is an original equipment (OE) supplier of floor carpet of automobile. The practice of classification for the product was under Heading 57 for long number of years. The duty paid by the appellant wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the classification of products. Instead, the earlier circular of 1987 had specifically held that classification of the item would be under Heading 57. The Counsel for the appellant emphasizes that any pre-deposit would upset the arrangement between the parties and would cause undue hardship. He would also submit that the classification is to be made under heading 57 only, in view of the specific ....