2006 (12) TMI 370
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r the Appellant. Shri Samir Chitkara, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - These two appeals are directed against the orders in original dated 25-2-06 and 26-2-06. 2. The issue involved in this case is the denial of Modvat credit to the appellants on "Shrink Sleeves" purchased by them from the supplier. The demands have been raised on the ground that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ecipient cannot be put to a disadvantageous. 4. Learned SDR reiterates the findings of the learned Commissioner. 5. Considered the submissions made by both sides and perused record. We find from the orders in original that the commissioner has denied Modvat credit to the appellant on the ground, that he has held in the case of supplier of "Shrink Sleeves", that their product is not....
TaxTMI