Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (12) TMI 358

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocate, for the Appellant. Shri Samir Chitkara, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. -  These appeals are filed against the Orders-in-Appeal Nos. 417 to 418/2002/Commr(A)/Raj, dated 25-10-2002 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The issues involved in both the cases are identical and the same are dealt with by a common order. 2. Heard both sid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that there has been no suppression of any relevant facts to the excise authorities and therefore, the demand raised by the department, beyond the normal period of limitation is hit by time bar. He also contests that the valuation adopted for scrap cannot be at par with the prime quality motor vehicle parts. He also relies on the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in an identical case vide Order ....