Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (12) TMI 334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri J.P. Gregory, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - This application seeks waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of a total amount of Rs. 71,67,765/-towards duty and Educational Cess as well as an equal amount of penalty. After examining the records and hearing both sides, we find that the above demand of duty is based on valuation of Gra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at it has been specially packed for the exclusive use of any industry as a raw material or for the purpose of servicing any industry, mine or quarry. There is a proviso to this clause, which is not applicable. We have also seen a package containing the commodity in question. This package carries a label containing the following declaration :- "This film is specially packed for the exclusive use....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to be rebutted by learned Counsel who is also claiming under the same decision of the Apex Court. His focus is on the penultimate sentence of para 5 of the judgment, which reads thus :- "In such a case, the relevant test is not its presence in the end-product, but the dependence of the end-product for its essential presence at the delivery end of the process. The ingredient goes into the making....