2006 (12) TMI 331

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri U.H. Jadhav, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  All eight appeals arise out of a common order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai and hence heard together and disposed of by this common order. 2. The brief facts of the case are that M/s. Virlon Textiles Mill Ltd. (hereinafter referred as the appellants), a 100% EOU....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation 4 of the Warehoused Goods (Removals) Regulations, 1963 read with Board's Circular No. 576/16/2001-CX., dated 26-6-2001 issued under Rule 20(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001 which sets out the warehousing provisions, if the warehousing certificate is not received within 90 days from the date of removal of the goods, the consignor shall be liable to pay appropriate duty leviable on such go....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the appellant-company and its Director. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the adjudication orders; hence these appeals before the Tribunal. 3. I have heard both sides. Movement of goods without payment of duty under the strength of CT-3 Certificate, from one EOU to another EOU is permitted subject to following certain procedure and observing certain conditions. In the present case there is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 90 days of the removal of the goods, weekly reminders must be issued by him to the Superintendent-in-charge of the consignee and if despite such reminders the original warehousing certificate is not received within a further period of 60 days of the expiry of the 90 days period, the Superintendent-in-charge of the consignor shall inform his Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner who shall eit....