2006 (11) TMI 489
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....i R.K. Singla, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - The appellant is a limited company incorporated under Companies Act. They were carrying on the activity of CHA. They were asked to show cause along with the export viz., M/s. Sweety International Pvt. Ltd. who had diverted huge quantities of Polyester knitted/woven/pile fabrics imported duty free against ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....en held that it is indicative of his role in attempted export fraud thereby rendering himself and the appellant liable for penalty under Section 114 of Customs-Act. The appellants contended that there was no finding with regard to the appellant's involvement except the Commissioner having observed in Para 63 that the appellants have acted in a manner unbecoming of a responsible CHA and violating t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... E.L.T. 737 (T). (vi) Syndicate Shipping Services (P) Ltd. v. CC, Chennai - 2004 (171) E.L.T. 72 (Tri.-Chennai.) (vii) U. Sivasubramanian v. CC, Trichy - 2004 (165) E.L.T. 97 (T) (viii) Bureau Veritas v. CC, Mumbai - 2003 (156) E.L.T. 688 (T) (ix) P.B. Nair C&F Pvt. Ltd. v. CC, Mumbai - 2006 (202) E.L.T. 829 3. The learned JCDR reiterated the depar....
TaxTMI