Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (11) TMI 489

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i R.K. Singla, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  The appellant is a limited company incorporated under Companies Act. They were carrying on the activity of CHA. They were asked to show cause along with the export viz., M/s. Sweety International Pvt. Ltd. who had diverted huge quantities of Polyester knitted/woven/pile fabrics imported duty free against ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en held that it is indicative of his role in attempted export fraud thereby rendering himself and the appellant liable for penalty under Section 114 of Customs-Act. The appellants contended that there was no finding with regard to the appellant's involvement except the Commissioner having observed in Para 63 that the appellants have acted in a manner unbecoming of a responsible CHA and violating t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... E.L.T. 737 (T). (vi)   Syndicate Shipping Services (P) Ltd. v. CC, Chennai - 2004 (171) E.L.T. 72 (Tri.-Chennai.) (vii)  U. Sivasubramanian v. CC, Trichy - 2004 (165) E.L.T. 97 (T) (viii) Bureau Veritas v. CC, Mumbai - 2003 (156) E.L.T. 688 (T) (ix)   P.B. Nair C&F Pvt. Ltd. v. CC, Mumbai - 2006 (202) E.L.T. 829 3. The learned JCDR reiterated the depar....