Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (11) TMI 481

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... J.C. Patel, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. This is a case where the Respondent herein had availed 100% CENVAT credit on the capital goods in the first Financial Year instead of 50% which is contrary to the Cenvat Rules . On pointing out the same, the Respondent herein reversed the said amount immediately. There was no utilization of the amount. Subsequ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... "It is trite to say that a decision is binding not because of its conclusions but in regard to its ratio and the principles laid down therein.............. Preceded without any' reason cannot be deemed to be a declaration of or authority of a general nature binding as a precedent". Except the above said ground, there is no other ground worthwhile to mention in respect of maintaining penalty....