2006 (5) TMI 427

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - M/s. Carborundum Universal Ltd., had filed an appeal accompanied by an application for stay against the Order-in-Appeal upholding demand of duty of Rs. 86,009/-, penalty of Rs. 86,009/- and demand of appropriate interest. By an Order dated 8-4-2005 the appellants were directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 86,009/- towards duty amount and to report com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of their appeal. 3. Today, learned Counsel Shri C.M. Kannan has appeared for the appellants and submitted that the payment of Rs. 86,009/- had been made on 9-3-2005 with the endorsement on the GAR - 7 Proforma a month before the order for pre-deposit was made by the Tribunal. When the order for pre-deposit was made by the Tribunal the advocate was not able to inform the Tribunal about the....