2006 (9) TMI 386
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Appellant. Shri N.D. George, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : K.K. Agarwal, Member (T)]. - This is a miscellaneous application filed by Revenue for rectifying the defect in the appeal filed by it, vide Appeal No. C/179/06 in respect of M/s. M.B. Electronics and others. 2. It is the contention of the Revenue that in this case the impugned order was passed by th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... has been so authorized by the Committee of Chief Commissioners. 3. The ld. Advocate for the Respondents submits that the application cannot be admitted, at this stage, as the defect, sought to be removed, is not curable and, if removed, the appeal should be considered to have been filed, in the proper form, on the date of filing such an application i.e. on 8-8-06, and, in that case, the a....
TaxTMI