Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (6) TMI 354

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent. [Order]. - This appeal is against a demand of interest on duty amount of Rs. 1,95,838/-, which was paid on 21-10-2003. The lower appellate authority has demanded interest at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- per day in terms of Rule 8(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and has imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the party under Rule 25 of the said Rules. It is submitted by learne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ause notice and, therefore, no penalty was liable to be imposed under Rule 25 ibid. In this connection, reliance is placed on Final Order No. 766/05, dated 26-5-2005 passed by this Bench in the case of Selvi Textiles (P) Ltd v. CCE, Coimbatore [E/471/2004]. Ld. SDR reiterates the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals). 2. After considering the submissions, I find that, in terms of Rule 8(3)....