2006 (5) TMI 356

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondent. [Order]. -  The appellant is engaged in manufacture of Bulk Drugs and Organic chemicals. They used to send inputs on which Cenvat credit was availed for job work to produce intermediates to their unit No. II under the provisions of rule 4(5)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 but unfortunately there was a fire accident on 3-10-2002 in Unit No. 2 in which semi-finished goods and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. 3. The appellant in their grounds of appeal have stated that once the inputs have been issued for manufacturing the credit on the same cannot be denied and referred to the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. A.C.C.E. - 1992 (61) E.L.T. 510 (Coll. Appls.) wherein it was held that when the intention of the appellant is to use the inputs in manufacture of its ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s reported at Commissioner v. Indchem Electronics - 2003 (157) E.L.T. A206 (S.C.) wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court after condoning the delay dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by Commissioner of Central excise, Chennai against the above CEGAT order. 4. It was submitted that since the inputs in their case were sent to their other unit for job work they have to be considered as has ....