2006 (4) TMI 419

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Sejpal, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri U.H. Jadhav, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : K.K. Agarwal, Member (T)]. - These are three appeals arising out of the same Order-in-Original. Two appeals have been filed by the Goa Bottling Company and Coca-Cola India Ltd. and third by the department. The appellants M/s. Goa Bottling Company are engaged in the manufacture of aerated water ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ould have formed part of the assessable value of the soft drinks manufactured and cleared by the appellant during the period from 1-4-94 to 31-10-95 and therefore they were issued a show cause notice demanding duty amounting to Rs. 23,42,635/- and seeking to impose penalty under Section 11AC and Rule 173Q(2) and penalty under Rule 209A on M/s. Coca Cola. 4. The learned Advocate for the fir....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....121) E.L.T. 718 (Tribunal) = 2000 (40) RLT 769 (CEGAT) wherein it was held that the additional consideration in the form of appellants getting incentives from raw material (concentrate) supplier the same not to be added to the assessable value of the final product sold by the appellants to their buyers as the incentives are not flowing directly or indirectly from the buyers of final product. It wa....