2007 (6) TMI 310

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Gupta, J.M. - This is an appeal by the Department against the order of the learned CIT(A) relating to block period from 1-4-1990 to 26-9-2000. 2. The Department is objecting in deleting the addition of Rs. 15 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer on account of undisclosed income. 2.1 The briefly stated facts of the case are that during the course of search computer CD marked Annex. 'O' was sei....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tention, in the form of affidavit of confirmation from Gautam Gupta that no disbursement had actually taken place for the said cash loan. The assessee had failed to come up with any plausible explanation and any form of evidence. Therefore, the Assessing Officer treated by observing that the assessee has taken this loan in cash and utilized the same for his business. However, repayment is reflecte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aken that the same has been returned to 'G'. Accordingly, the CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer. Now the Department is in appeal here before the Tribunal. 4. The learned Departmental Representative strongly placed reliance on the order of the Assessing Officer. Part of the order of the Assessing Officer was read by the learned Departmental Representative. It was further ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or this reason also no addition can be made on account of undisclosed income because there was no evidence at all that the assessee has paid the amount of Rs. 15 lakhs out of his undisclosed income. 5. After considering the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) and the submissions, we find no infirmity in the findings of the learned CIT(A). The learned CIT(A), in para 24 of his order has r....