2005 (6) TMI 510

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....K. Mishra, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Heard Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, ld. Consultant for the appellants and Shri N.K. Mishra, Id. JDR for the respondents. 2. Shri Chattopadhyay submits that in view of the judgment in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur v. J K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. reported in 2004 (171) E.L.T. 289 (S.C.), they don't dispute the findings arr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eriod in dispute was involved April, '02 to August, '02. Therefore, the findings of the Tribunal's decision prior to this period is not applicable on the present facts of the case. He submits that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commr. of Central Excise, Jaipur v. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. referred to above, has disallowed the CENVAT credit on the inputs used in the mines situated outside t....