2006 (5) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. Shri K.S. Reddy, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  The appellants are required to pre-deposit duty amount of Rs. 4,78,08,412/- and another amount of Rs. 4,97,24,263/- in respect of two appeals and stay applications. The appellants had been receiving 'Naphtha' for their unit in terms of Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. dated 1-3-2002 as amended....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ble as the notification exempts the duty on Naphtha being used by the power plants. 3. The learned JDR defends the order. He submits that warehousing facility was withdrawn and therefore the benefit of notification cannot be extended for the reasons given by the Commissioner. 4. On a careful consideration of the matter, we find that the Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. dated 1-3-2002, ....