Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (5) TMI 331

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. Ms. A.B. Jindal, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)].-  Heard both the sides and perused record. The demand is for the period May, 1999 to July, 2001. The same was raised through show cause notice dated 12-7-2002. 2. The appellants contended before the lower authorities that the demand is beyond the period of limitation permissible inasmuch as th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ration, it is seen that the appellant have declared the impugned product as under -           "Cotton Yarn (other than sewing thread) containing 85% or more by weight of Cotton           - Cotton yarn, not containing Synthetic Staple fibre           Core S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the same time, on examination of impugned declaration, I also find that nowhere the Appellants had declared that the impugned Lycra Yarn consists of elastic/stretching characteristics or intended use of the same or mention of the fact that it can be used for weaving of fabrics unlike the gimped yarn, which they are contending after classifying the same under Heading No. 56.06 by the revenue." ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... yarn or its intended use. Thus, the assessee could not be found fault with for not stating those particulars. It is well settled that failure to disclose particulars which are not legally required to be disclosed does not constitute suppression of facts. If any more particulars were relevant or required for determining classification, Revenue could have asked the appellants for details before ass....