2006 (3) TMI 584

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. Shri U.H. Jadhav, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. -  After hearing both sides, duly represented by Shri V.K. Jain, the Ld. Advocate for the appellants and Shri U.H. Jadhav, the Ld. D.R., we find that demand of duty of Rs. 34,66,786/- stands confirmed against the appellant by denying them the benefit of Notification No. 203/92-Cus., dated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant has challenged the above order on merits as also on limitation. Apart from contending that there is no finding that Modvat credit was availed by the appellant, they have also submitted that the demand is barred by limitation. In fact, the entire demand is beyond the maximum limitation period of five years. Reliance has been placed on the Tribunal's decision in the case of Futura Fashions Pvt....