Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (10) TMI 461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Appellant. S/Shri V. Sridharan and Bharat Raichandani, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides. It has been brought to our notice by both sides that there is a direction contained in the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's order dated 28th September, 2005 to dispose off the stay application filed by Revenue within a period ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... behalf of the respondents, Shri V. Sridharan, learned advocate cites the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Guntur v. Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited, 1986 (26) E.L.T. 750 (Tribunal) and states that this is not a fit case for granting stay of the Tribunal order. He also states that the impugned amount was deposited by the respondent as per the direction of the H....