Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (10) TMI 461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dharan and Bharat Raichandani, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides. It has been brought to our notice by both sides that there is a direction contained in the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's order dated 28th September, 2005 to dispose off the stay application filed by Revenue within a period of three weeks. 2. Shri R.B. Pard....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an, learned advocate cites the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Guntur v. Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited, 1986 (26) E.L.T. 750 (Tribunal) and states that this is not a fit case for granting stay of the Tribunal order. He also states that the impugned amount was deposited by the respondent as per the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and after the final or....