2005 (9) TMI 536

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... M.V. Raman, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. -  The respondents were engaged in the manufacture of 'wet grinders', on job work basis, for M/s. Elgi Ultra Appliances Ltd. (EUAL, for short). The inputs for the wet grinders were supplied by M/s. EUAL under their invoices issued under Rule 57GG of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The respondents availed M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....11-4-2005 passed by this Bench in the case of CCE v. Precious Equipments (P) Ltd. (Appeal Nos. E/3449 & 3450/98) 3. We find that M/s. Precious Equipments (P) Ltd. were also job workers for M/s. EUAL and that they were also engaged in the same activity as that of the present respondents. This Bench allowed Modvat credit to M/s. Precious Equipments (P) Ltd. in respect of the inputs supplied ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enue contended that stock transfer of input under such invoices did not amount to 'sale' as defined under Section 2(h) of the Central Excise Act and therefore the above invoices were not valid documents for availment of Modvat credit on the inputs. This contention was rejected by the Tribunal holding that such transfer of input to the job worker amounted to 'sale' within the meaning of Section 2(h....