2005 (8) TMI 549

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... P.M. Rao, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Heard both sides. 2. The appellant filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the benefit of Modvat credit was denied on the ground that the inputs were not declared by the appellant under the declaration filed under Rule 57G of Central Excise Rules. 3. The contention of the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The contention is that as the duty paid goods were used in the manufacture of final products these are under the same tariff heading as declared in the declaration and only the manufacturer of inputs describes the same with a different name hence the credit cannot be denied. The contention is also that now Rule 57G has been amended by the Notification No. 7/99-C.E. to the effect that credit ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion (outer) with the brand name Sleep Well. Similar is the situation the appellant received printed blocks classifiable under the same tariff heading, the same is mentioned in the declaration whereas in the declaration it is mentioned PU Foam Blocks. The Board after taking into consideration of provisions of Notification No. 7/99 and issued a circular dated 23-2-99 whereby it has been clarified t....