2005 (7) TMI 552
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Shri R.K. Chandan, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T. Anjaneyulu, Member (J)]. - Heard both sides. 2. This appeal is filed against an Order-in-Original dated 30-9-2002 wherein the appellants were imposed a penalty of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) under Rule 173Q(1)(a) and (d) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appellant is Noticee No. 5 along with others. In the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... fabrics from various processing houses on payment of processing charges. In the past, the appellants got their fabrics processed from M/s. AFL. 4. The aforesaid penalty was sought to be imposed on the ground that the appellants had connived with M/s. AFL by purchasing and keeping the processed fabrics, which were illicitly cleared by the said processor. The appellants submit that there is....
TaxTMI